Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Gail Kerr YOU Represent What's Wrong With Gannett: YOU Knew About DOE Fraud and That a Whistleblower was ABUSED and YOU Did NOTHING......
Nissan Partner Renault NOT Using OUTDATED Leaf Battery Technology.... America Bought a 1.4 Billion Dollar Lemon http://t.co/AbkyRXtJ less than a minute ago
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Ignore This Gail.....
Copy of lawsuit being filed TODAY in the State of Tennessee
At Franklin
Sharyn Bovat, Plaintiff
Vs.
Nissan North America, Inc. Defendant.
COMPLAINT
Comes the Plaintiff, Sharyn Bovat (“Bovat”), by and through counsel, and sues the Defendant, Nissan North America, Inc. (“Nissan”), and for cause would state and show as follows:
I
The parties
- The Plaintiff, Sharyn Bovat, is a citizen and resident of Williamson County, Tennessee and was such for all times material hereto. The Plaintiff is a whistleblower for various assertions regarding Nissan, its hiring practices, and its use of federal money for the development of the Nissan Leaf which is a technological and financial failure.
- The Defendant, Nissan North America, Inc. (“Nissan”) is located in Williamson County, TN. Its registered agent is LexisNexis Document Solutions, Inc., 2908 Poston Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203-1312.
II
venue and jurisdiction
- The Plaintiff avers that venue is proper in this Court because all acts complained of occurred and accrued in Williamson County, TN.
- The Plaintiff avers that jurisdiction is proper in this Court because it has in personam and subject matter jurisdiction over the parties and this type of dispute.
III
the facts
- The Plaintiff avers that the Defendant had her charged with stalking on the 11th of October, 2010 and she was arrested on charges of criminal trespass and stalking in indictment # I-CR105253.
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, did not have probable cause to bring charges against her for stalking particularly since a corporation cannot be the victim of stalking pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315.
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, misused and abused the court system in an attempt to silence the Plaintiff because of her internet postings which revealed compromising information about Defendant, Nissan, and its use of government money to finance the Nissan Leaf which is an abyssmal failure.
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, brought the false charge against her in order to silence her and it did so with malice.
- The Plaintiff avers that this case was tried before a jury on February 1, 2012. The Plaintiff further avers that the stalking charge against her was dismissed upon her motion to dismiss at the close of the state’s proof because a corporation cannot be a victim of a stalking charge brought pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1).
- The Plaintiff avers that she was arrested for violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1) on several occasions and forfeited her freedom as part of the unlawful scheme and covin instituted by Defendant, Nissan, and Carlos Tavares and Carlos Ghosn, to silence the Plaintiff.
- The Plaintiff avers that the charge remained pending against her for almost two years while she awaited trial and that this caused her great stress and anxiety.
- The Plaintiff avers that she has suffered extreme stress, humiliation, embarrassment and anxiety as a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s actions.
- The Plaintiff published a blog at www.girlintheblackhonda.com which was critical of Defendant, Nissan’s, use of federal tax dollars for the development and manufacture of the electric vehicle Nissan calls the Leaf, which is an acronym for “Leading Environmentally Friendly, Affordable, Family” car. The Plaintiff has been critical of the waste of the federal tax dollars particularly with the short distance the Leaf can actually go on a single battery charge.
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, was motivated to silence her due to her critical internet postings and that it used the criminal justice system in order to do so.
IV
first Cause of action
malicious prosecution
- The Plaintiff relies upon the factual averments in numbered paragraphs 1-14 in support of the following cause of action.
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, has committed the tort of malicious prosecution by having her charged and arrested for stalking when she could not lawfully be charged with violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1).
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, did not have the legal authority or probable cause to charge her with violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1).
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, and with the aid and assistance of the Williamson County District Attorney, maliciously charged her with stalking in order to silence her.
- The Plaintiff avers that on February 1, 2012 the charge against her for violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1) was dismissed at trial at the close of the state’s proof by Judge Walter Kurtz who agreed with her position and argument that a corporation cannot be a victim of stalking pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1). This constitutes a termination of the unlawful stalking charge in her favor.
- The Plaintiff avers that the stalking charge was brought against her for unlawful purposes in order to silence her and Defendant, Nissan, used its political weight in Williamson County to compel the Williamson County District Attorney’s Office to prosecute the Plaintiff and incarcerate her using a statute, namely Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1), which could not be lawfully used. The Plaintiff was jailed, had to post a bond, make numerous court appearances and hire a defense attorney to defend her.
- The Plaintiff avers that the Williamson County District Attorney knew that the Plaintiff could not be legally charged with violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1) at all times yet they proceeded with initially charging her using a warrant and then by convening and presenting the charge to the Williamson County Grand Jury in secret.
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, also hired a private prosecutor who attempted to prosecute the charge against her. The Defendant, Nissan, hired the former Williamson County District Attorney, Mr. Joseph D. Baugh, to prosecute the charge against her. Mr. Baugh is a well-respected, capable attorney, with years of experience prosecuting criminal offenses.
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, had the aid and counsel of the taxpayers’ funded District Attorney General’s Office and the former District Attorney General himself, Mr. Joseph D. Baugh, to advise it, consult with, and prosecute the Plaintiff on the illegal charge of violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1).
- The Plaintiff avers that she has sustained significant financial and physical injuries as a result of being charged illegally with a crime that she could not actually commit, by being incarcerated illegally, by having to pay bail money, and having to hire attorneys, as well as the pain, humiliation, stress and anxiety caused by facing up to eleven months and twenty-nine days in jail. The Plaintiff avers that the Defendant’s actions were intentional, malicious and they warrant punitive damages.
V
second Cause of action
abuse of process
- The Plaintiff relies upon the factual averments in numbered paragraphs 1-24 in support of the following cause of action.
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, used the process of the Court in arresting the Plaintiff and charging her for an improper purpose and with an improper motive.
- The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, used the warrant and capias process to further its objective of silencing the Plaintiff.
- The Plaintiff avers that she has sustained damages as a direct and proximate result of the Defendant’s actions as previously pled.
THE PLAINTIFF PRAYS FOR THE FOLLOWING RELIEF:
- That the Defendant be served with process and be required to answer within the time allowed by law;
- That the Plaintiff be awarded compensatory damages in an amount in excess of $250,000;
- That the Plaintiff be awarded punitive damages in an amount to be determined by the jury;
- That a jury of six (6) be impaneled to hear this action;
- That she be awarded such other, further relief to which she may be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________
G. Kline Preston, IV
TBPR #17141
Kline Preston Law Group, P.C.
Belle Meade Office Park
4515 Harding Pike, Suite 107
Nashville, TN 37205
Tel: (615) 279-1619
Fax: (866) 610-9565
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
To Gail Kerr..... Bottomline... YOU Might Actually Agree With Me....
To the people in Tennessee
that slandered me by telling people I was gay. YOU DID IT BECAUSE YOU'RE CORRUPT!!!
FYI: I'm not gay but could "change teams" IF Good Ole Boys (like Al Gore) are the only ones offered .... This is the issue that I'm so DISTURBED about: A Tennessee ADA in October 2010 wanted the judge to have me evaluated for "mental" illness NOT because of the wacky CIA crap I write but because of a similar quote that I put above.... they think that gays are mentally ill in Tennessee. It's SCARY!!!

I'm NOT Crazy NISSAN "outing" me was!!!
Odds are Al Gore read my blog because he wanted to date me...
Popular Posts from My Blog
-
Lot's of "agent orange" destroyed the rubber trees in Vietnam (and the people) and the market in Brazil started to solidify (?) My dad die...
-
Solar and Goldman issues after Haley Barbour Issues -----Original Message----- From: sharynbovat To: Ed_Rogers ...
-
Jim Morton the former NISSAN Vice Chairman met the NISSAN CEO Carlos Ghosn at Michelin and he was Ghosn's "right hand man"... Afte...
-
Corrections Highlighted in Pink The ERA of Nation Building is ending: The Era of America Becoming the Global Hall Monitor MUST Begin...
-
Both the stories were on my blog along time ago....the New York TImes had an another article today about Gaddafi funding Sarkozy. OMG!!!...
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Is Randy Tired After Giving NISSAN the Big Blow Job on Sunday??? Jobs are Going to Mexico.... I hope Gannett Got a Big Tip
Nissan expects production boost from $2 bn plant in Mexico
Published July 10, 2012
EFE
Japanese
automaker Nissan has laid the first stone at its new $2 billion plant
in Mexico, where it expects to increase production to more than 1
million units annually.
"The new Aguascalientes complex underscores the objectives set forth by Nissan's global strategy, Nissan Power 88, including a target global market share of 8 percent. The increase of manufacturing capacity for an operation that has already proven its leadership will enable us to deliver more innovative vehicles for markets that are clamoring for them," Nissan Americas vice chairman Bill Krueger said.
"The new Aguascalientes complex underscores the objectives set forth by Nissan's global strategy, Nissan Power 88, including a target global market share of 8 percent. The increase of manufacturing capacity for an operation that has already proven its leadership will enable us to deliver more innovative vehicles for markets that are clamoring for them," Nissan Americas vice chairman Bill Krueger said.
Read more: http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2012/07/10/nissan-expects-production-boost-from-2-bn-plant-in-mexico/#ixzz20FdFNGG8
On Sunday Gannett did a BIG SPREAD on Mississippi Jobs... Meanwhile Bill Krueger is enjoying margarita's in Mexico.....
Is Rutherford County Paying back the American taxpauyers the 1.4 Billion?
Gail Maybe You Can NOT Cover Future Hearings About NISSAN Fraud..... NC is Having Hearing NOW
NISSAN Whistleblower Connects Duke Energy, Jim ...
youtube.comNew2 days ago - 5 min - Uploaded by sharynbovat
A whistleblower at Duke Energy was silenced and NOW a "bait and switch" in the boardroom happened hours ...Dept. of Energy IGO Told About DUKE Energy's ...
youtube.comNew1 day ago - 3 min - Uploaded by sharynbovat
She sent him link to vidoe and has blogged that DUKE Energy paid off a ... Jim Rogers Duke Energy · Duke ...Duke Energy's CEO Jim Rogers Needs to Answer ...
youtube.comNew11 hours ago - 2 min - Uploaded by sharynbovat
NC Roy Cooper · Jim Rogers Duke Energy · Duke Energy Scandal · Sharyn ... Dept. of Energy IGO Told ...
Gail Answer This..... I just talked to Mark Silveman and he says I have a "good point"......
Why would someone connected to top Nissan
executives want to "set me up" with Al Gore AFTER Nissan "trumped up"
charges against me and had me jailed 3 times?
Its my understanding the state of tennessee showed a "secret grand jury an email that was about my PERSONAL life" IS THAT TRUE?
Was I indicted because of my "California morals?".
That
email was not connected to Al Gore but it was related a member of
Nissan management that tried to date me after my 1st arrest. He
contacted Me! He did NOT tell me originally WHO he worked for.
I feel like the State of Tennessee was willing to "throw me out of an airplane"
They were going to jail an innocent person just because of fraud going on with the electric car?

The Al Gore inquiry I thought it was a joke (at first) and made a "flippant" remark (to the right) It was supposed to be FUNNY. NOW I realize had I dated Al Gore maybe the "trumped up" charges would have been dropped?
In America women should be able to not feel pressured to date anyone for fear of judicial retaliation.

Nissan slandered me- That I'm 100% on an nobody at at the DA's office cares WHY?
Yes in 2009 I did perceivably "date" Catherine Perez who was the most powerful woman at the company. I went to dinners and parties with her for 2 reasons: a) she was smart and I enjoyed spending time with her B) I was going to be getting a divorce & needed to get a job that included health care...
Sharyn Bovat pictured with Dee Kelly wife of Greg Kelly for many years they were friends and Sharyn heard "stories" about discrimination at NISSAN, NOT from Dee.... From her other friends.
At
the time I knew Nissan was discriminating against women - other
companies had similar Good Ole Boy reputation (also i was told that i
was TOO SMART to work at Nissan - Both HR leaders Mark Stout and Marlin
Chapman told me- the fact is BIG picture thinkers with IQ'a over 140
scare people - its nothing new).
I told Catherine and she promised she Would help me get the job I needed with healthcare AFTER the "internal battle of control". There was a WAR going on for leadership of Renault.
Yes Cathering told me she "loved" me..... many times... I have emails from her too.....
Did I flirt with a VP to ger a job.... That could be the ONLY thing I'm guilty of....
Its my understanding the state of tennessee showed a "secret grand jury an email that was about my PERSONAL life" IS THAT TRUE?
Was I indicted because of my "California morals?".

I feel like the State of Tennessee was willing to "throw me out of an airplane"
They were going to jail an innocent person just because of fraud going on with the electric car?

The Al Gore inquiry I thought it was a joke (at first) and made a "flippant" remark (to the right) It was supposed to be FUNNY. NOW I realize had I dated Al Gore maybe the "trumped up" charges would have been dropped?
In America women should be able to not feel pressured to date anyone for fear of judicial retaliation.

Nissan slandered me- That I'm 100% on an nobody at at the DA's office cares WHY?
Yes in 2009 I did perceivably "date" Catherine Perez who was the most powerful woman at the company. I went to dinners and parties with her for 2 reasons: a) she was smart and I enjoyed spending time with her B) I was going to be getting a divorce & needed to get a job that included health care...
Sharyn Bovat pictured with Dee Kelly wife of Greg Kelly for many years they were friends and Sharyn heard "stories" about discrimination at NISSAN, NOT from Dee.... From her other friends.

I told Catherine and she promised she Would help me get the job I needed with healthcare AFTER the "internal battle of control". There was a WAR going on for leadership of Renault.
Yes Cathering told me she "loved" me..... many times... I have emails from her too.....
Did I flirt with a VP to ger a job.... That could be the ONLY thing I'm guilty of....
Saturday, July 7, 2012
Gail Here's Something ELSE You-The Tennessean and Gannett Can Ignore.... Fuck the Taxpayers.... People at YOUR Company Get Good Deals on Infinitis..... It's Pathetic
Watch this video it connects NISSAN Fraud
DUKE Energy Scandal that is "emerging"....
http://youtu.be/Xxl-nnf-ZA8
It's Time to Treat America with RESPECT!!!
DUKE Energy Scandal that is "emerging"....
http://youtu.be/Xxl-nnf-ZA8
It's Time to Treat America with RESPECT!!!
Friday, July 6, 2012
Question for Gail Kerr..... and Tribute to Mark Silverman
June Monthly CYTD
CYTD CYTD
2012 2011
% chg 2012
Nissan Division Total 81,801
65,659 24.6 523,344
457,705 14.3
Versa 8,746 4,345
101.3 60,919 45,886
32.8
Sentra 9,211 8,077
14.0 55,984 65,130
-14.0
Cube 711 1,313
-45.8 4,085 11,492
-64.5
Altima 21,812 19,534
11.7 157,101 131,842
19.2
Maxima
4,605 4,537
1.5 30,104 26,515
13.5
LEAF 535 1,708
-68.7 3,148 3,875
-18.8
Gail Kerr How are YOU Going to Put Lipstick on the Pig?
NISSAN Whistleblower told
Leaf was to be an "Image car"and not intended to be mass
marketed. Then WHY did NISSAN take OVER 1 Billion dollars of DOE
taxpayer money to build a battery plant to MASS produce batteries?
The NISSAN Leaf REALLY cost
63,000 to 67,000 just to manufacture.
The $63,000 Leaf price is achieved by statements from and industry expert
who said “the non battery part of the Leaf would be approx. 15-20K” then added
“that does not include marketing or R & D” & realistically
the car cost 80k.
Each Leaf battery has
48 modules and each module cost about $1000 to produce*. That’s $48,000
JUST for the battery modules. *Nissan
says they will replace the modules for about $650; I
was told it's due to "recycling"...
“replacing
a single module in the Leaf's 48-module battery pack would cost £404” Andy
Palmer Board Member NISSAN Motors. (that’s 48K for JUST parts of the battery pack) http://green.autoblog.com/2011/08/03/need-to-replace-a-nissan-leaf-battery-hows-19-392-31-753-u/
Carlos Ghosn says the Leaf will NOT be built it it’s not profitable. Other’s
have said NISSAN has to sell 500,000
just to break even. It cost NISSAN 80K to make a Leaf & they sell the
car for 33k. To the average eye NOW it looks like a Ponzi
scheme.
NISSAN has been secretive about the battery
cost for a reason
Carlos Ghosn said the
Renault EV spy scandal http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12160430 was about the
“business model”.
Sharyn Bovat worked with top NISSAN and Renault executives. They did NOT want anyone to know details of the
EV (some used code words). Others at NISSAN communicated to Sharyn that the Leaf was “built to fail” & that
NISSAN
would go bankrupt “if” the Leaf succeeded.
The retail
price of the Leaf is $33,000 the federal subsidies are $7,500 some states are
adding an EXTRA $2,500 - $5,000 of incentives.
The NISSAN Leaf is 65% to 75%
subsidized.
NISSAN says the “average”
income for Leaf owners is OVER $140,000.
Sharyn Bovat blogged
before the DOE loan closed that the “Leaf would fail” and she’s suffered
retaliation in asking NISSAN for transparency in reference to the federal DOE
loan that NISSAN was granted for 1.4 Billion by the
DOE to create an EV battery plant in Smyrna Tennessee. The bank
used to obtain the DOE taxpayer funded "cash" is a US government bank
that was created to give loans to the Veteran’s and Post Office & is
notorious for NOT getting repaid.
Why is a
bank created for American interest being used for a FOREIGN company that does
business with IRAN?
NISSAN partners with Renault & Renault does business in Iran. Car sales for Renault have increased 70% this year.
NISSAN shares technology
with Renault.
Iran is sending weapons to KILL
American soldiers.
Back to the economic issue:
NISSAN has only sold about
30,000 Leafs in America and about 12,000 worldwide.
When asking for DOE money Carlos Ghosn said that
“by 2012” there would be 100,000. Revised DOE stats show 50,000.
This year NISSAN
has sold about 3000.
NISSAN will not give out the
statistics on “who’s buying the Leafs”.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)